Kent
11-13-2007, 11:59 AM
My son and I had a discussion on this the other day as we've had in the past since he is catholic and I'm not. Now that doesn't mean those that aren't catholic automatically think it's okay, I am not saying that at all.
He is 16 and has been taught the church line/stance that a fetus is a human, actual life and under no conditions should it ever be ended.
My thoughts are that why life is something to protect and value, that in some cases and with science the way it is today, that not every fetus needs or should be carried to the point of birth.
Here are my reasons and thinking at this point and while I am not looking for a heated debate it might happen so please lets remember that we have the right to disagree and not get into name calling or such.
Rape babies. Why should a female be forced to carry a baby from an act of violence unless she wants to?
Incest. So some will argue that babies from an act of incest have no more a chance of having birth defects or mental issues than the next but come on, we know it happens a lot but since it's a taboo event, even in todays society it's not spoken of and hidden from the public. There is much more I can say on this but I'd like to see others thoughts and ideas first.
Known health issues or birth defects. Again because of science most know of the baby's health condition not long after conception, so you know your baby has one of more severe and maybe drastic health issues that will make them dependable on others all their life and will limit them to live in a state that when old folks get old and can't help themselves we push them into a nursing care center to await their death, or the quality of their life will not be viable to any point. So is is really right or fair to do that to someone? Keep in mind that some just can't deal with it so they know as soon as the baby is born it's going to some institution, so why should they be forced to give birth?
Yea I know, it's not the same, but say I have a mole on my body that is cancer and I want it gone, don't I have the right to get something on my own body removed? Should I have to keep it there and get sick or die just because the government says no, God put that there so you have to keep it. Yea, to me at this point a baby is the same thing as a mole. The only difference to me is that their are two people involved, the mother and the father, not the family or grandparents or anyone else. If one wants it then they should have that right, but if they don't, why should I have the right to force it on them.
Now I do have strong thoughts on what I and others call baby making machines, those that get pregnant to live off the tax dollars and then get to the point where even they can't deal with another child. If they want the abortion fine, do it, but at the same time also remove their reproductive organs and I mean both parents. But that can be another topic.
So what are your thoughts?
He is 16 and has been taught the church line/stance that a fetus is a human, actual life and under no conditions should it ever be ended.
My thoughts are that why life is something to protect and value, that in some cases and with science the way it is today, that not every fetus needs or should be carried to the point of birth.
Here are my reasons and thinking at this point and while I am not looking for a heated debate it might happen so please lets remember that we have the right to disagree and not get into name calling or such.
Rape babies. Why should a female be forced to carry a baby from an act of violence unless she wants to?
Incest. So some will argue that babies from an act of incest have no more a chance of having birth defects or mental issues than the next but come on, we know it happens a lot but since it's a taboo event, even in todays society it's not spoken of and hidden from the public. There is much more I can say on this but I'd like to see others thoughts and ideas first.
Known health issues or birth defects. Again because of science most know of the baby's health condition not long after conception, so you know your baby has one of more severe and maybe drastic health issues that will make them dependable on others all their life and will limit them to live in a state that when old folks get old and can't help themselves we push them into a nursing care center to await their death, or the quality of their life will not be viable to any point. So is is really right or fair to do that to someone? Keep in mind that some just can't deal with it so they know as soon as the baby is born it's going to some institution, so why should they be forced to give birth?
Yea I know, it's not the same, but say I have a mole on my body that is cancer and I want it gone, don't I have the right to get something on my own body removed? Should I have to keep it there and get sick or die just because the government says no, God put that there so you have to keep it. Yea, to me at this point a baby is the same thing as a mole. The only difference to me is that their are two people involved, the mother and the father, not the family or grandparents or anyone else. If one wants it then they should have that right, but if they don't, why should I have the right to force it on them.
Now I do have strong thoughts on what I and others call baby making machines, those that get pregnant to live off the tax dollars and then get to the point where even they can't deal with another child. If they want the abortion fine, do it, but at the same time also remove their reproductive organs and I mean both parents. But that can be another topic.
So what are your thoughts?